BCS schools vs. Non-BCS schools

I do not think that there should be a difference between teams being a "BCS", or "Non-BCS". I think this because in the last couple of years the "Non-BCS" teams have provrn that they can beat the "BCS" teams. For exmple, in 2007 the Boise State Broncos defeated the Oklahoma Sooners in the Tostitos Fiesta bowl capping a 13-0 season for them, a feat that no one believed possible. Also, this past year the Utah Utes deafeted the Alabama Crimson Tide(the team that held the #1 ranking for the longets time in that season) in the Sugar bowl capping their second undefeated season in 4 years. So why are we still labeling these teams BCS teams and Non-BCS teams? If your school is rated as a BCS school then you alreadt have an advantage because voters are more apt to put your school in a bigger game because they are know to be "better". So, in these two seasons that I have mentioned about the winner of the national championship had a loos to their belt, and these two, so called "Non-BCS", schools beat a "BCS" school in a bowl game and finished the season undefeated. I think that it is just not fair to these schools because they continue to prove that they can play with anyone, but they are still left out of the discussion for the National Championship.

BCS Good or Bad

As a college football player and fan, I believe that the BCs has some major flaws that can be fixed. To help with this problem i think that there needs to be a type of "playoff system added to the BCS". I believe that the bowl games are fun and are great for college fooball, so after all of the bowl games the teams should be re-ranked and then the national championship after the re-rankings. The early BCS games will act as a "playoff" and teams would be benificial to all teams. This would keep the current BCS system in place and be more fair to all of the teams because they will all get their chance in the bowl game to make the national title game. I recent years there have been some controversy with the teams that made the national title game. For example this year Oklahoma made the game by jumping Texas in the polls inspite of them losing the head-to-head match betewwn the two schools. Also, from this year Utah did not get any recgonition for the naational title and they were the only undefeated team in the coultry. So, as you can see there are some flaws in the current system, but there are some positives in the system as well. This could all be fixed and be mare more fair and just as fun and just as good for college football.